- 31 -
In Switzerland Pietism was regarded with suspicion by the authorities; in Zürich, for example, there was something of a witchhunt after the prophecies of Hans Ulrich Giezendanner, a local goldsmith, had been interpreted as a denunciation of the government. In 1717 Pietism was banned from the city, but in 1722 this ban was modified to allow meetings on certain conditions. One of these was that men and women must be segregated, which suggests that Pietists were also under suspicion on moral grounds. Also in 1717, after a young woman had gone into an ecstatic trance during an Easter Monday service in St. Gallen, it was discovered that she belonged to a group led by Giezendanner which included many of the local Protestant clergy. In northeast Switzerland many clergymen had some sympathy with Pietism, which may explain why complete separation from the church did not happen and the persecution of Pietism was generally not very severe.11. Other matters as they come to mind:
11
, but in Krinau school lasted only ten weeks, and several of these we missed because of heavy snowfalls. Moreover, I could already be employed in all kinds of useful work. We were set to earn something during the winter-time. My father tried all kinds of spinning: flax, hemp, silk, wool and cotton, and he taught us how to card and to knit stockings and the like. But in those days nothing brought much income. Our diet was restricted until it was mainly milk and more milk, and we were allowed to go about in rags and tatters, to save money. Until my sixteenth year I rarely went to church, and11
The school at Krinau was kept by Jorg Brunner; Bräker attended it for ten weeks each year for six years. The curriculum was limited to the three Rs and psalm-singing. (Voellmy, v 1 p 15).
Contents |