- 100 -
| Therefore the parish share is |
259
2,728
|
= £763.00. ===== |
5.3.8
Some dioceses have a priority system, Southwark for example
"...works on the principle that the first charge on every parish is
the cost of its staff, housing and working expenses..." and operates
a differential system accordingly.
5.3.9
The diocese of Bath and Wells - apparently uniquely - offers a
choice of five schemes:
"(a) 10p per head of population, plus £885 per parson.
(b) A straight increase based on their old (actual income)
scheme.
(c) A scheme based solely on Electoral Roll.
(d) 10p per head of E.R., plus £1,107 per parson.
(e) £1 per head of E.R., plus £9l6 per parson.
The Deanery is left to work out the scheme best suited to their own
Deanery."
5.3.10
Gloucester are particularly commended by Catton for the clarity
with which their scheme is presented to parishes and parishioners,
a need which this writer would endorse - surely adequate presentation
is the lubricant without which no mechanism, however skilfully designed
can be operated successfully?
5.4
Other Papers Considered
5.4.1
Dilnot
In July 1978 the Reverend John Dilnot, working from Leeds
Vicarage produced a paper
(T4)
which to some extent duplicates
